Industry-based Guidance on implementing
Climate-related Disclosures
Volume 32—Electric Utilities & Power Generators
June 2023
IFRS S2
IFRS
® Sustainability Disclosure Standard
International Sustainability Standards Board
This Industry-based Guidance accompanies IFRS S2 Climate related Disclosures (published
June 2023; see separate booklet) and is issued by the International Sustainability
Standards Board (ISSB).
Disclaimer: To the extent permitted by applicable law, the ISSB and the IFRS Foundation
(Foundation) expressly disclaim all liability howsoever arising from this publication or
any translation thereof whether in contract, tort or otherwise to any person in respect of
any claims or losses of any nature including direct, indirect, incidental or consequential
loss, punitive damages, penalties or costs.
Information contained in this publication does not constitute advice and should not be
substituted for the services of an appropriately qualified professional.
© IFRS Foundation 2023
Reproduction and use rights are strictly limited to personal non-commercial use, such as
corporate disclosure.
Any other use, such as – but not limited to – reporting software, investment analysis,
data services and product development is not permitted without written consent. Please
contact the Foundation for further details at sustainability_licensing@ifrs.org.
All rights reserved.
The Foundation has trade marks registered around the world (Marks) including ‘IAS®’,
‘IASB®’, the IASB® logo, ‘IFRIC®’, ‘IFRS®’, the IFRS® logo, ‘IFRS for SMEs®’, the IFRS for SMEs®
logo,
‘International
Accounting
Standards®’,
‘International
Financial
Reporting
Standards®’, the ‘Hexagon Device’, ‘NIIF®’, ‘SIC®’ and SASB®. Further details of the
Foundation’s Marks are available from the Foundation on request.
The Foundation is a not-for-profit corporation under the General Corporation Law of the
State of Delaware, USA and operates in England and Wales as an overseas company
(Company number: FC023235) with its principal office in the Columbus Building, 7
Westferry Circus, Canary Wharf, London, E14 4HD.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
1
Introduction
This volume is part of the Industry-based Guidance on Implementing IFRS S2 Climate-related
Disclosures. This guidance suggests possible ways to apply some of the disclosure requirements in
IFRS S2 but does not create additional requirements.
This volume suggests possible ways to identify, measure and disclose information about
climate-related risks and opportunities that are associated with particular business
models, economic activities and other common features that characterise participation in
this industry.
This industry-based guidance has been derived from Sustainability Accounting Standards
Board (SASB) Standards, which are maintained by the International Sustainability
Standards Board (ISSB). The metric codes used in SASB Standards have been included for
ease of reference. For additional context regarding the industry-based guidance contained
in this volume, including structure and terminology, application and illustrative
examples, refer to Section III of the Accompanying Guidance to IFRS S2.
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
2
© IFRS Foundation
Volume 32—Electric Utilities & Power Generators
Industry Description
Electric Utilities & Power Generators industry entities generate electricity; build, own and
operate transmission and distribution (T&D) lines; and sell electricity. Utilities generate
electricity from many different sources, commonly including coal, natural gas, nuclear
energy, hydropower, solar, wind and other renewable and fossil fuel energy sources. The
industry comprises entities operating in both regulated and unregulated business
structures. Regulated utilities face comprehensive regulatory oversight of their pricing
mechanisms and their allowed return on equity, among other types of regulation, to
maintain their licence to operate as a monopoly. Unregulated entities or merchant power
entities are often independent power producers (IPPs) that generate electricity to sell to
the wholesale market, which includes regulated utility buyers and other end users.
Furthermore, entities in the industry may operate across both regulated and deregulated
power markets depending on their operational span. Regulated markets typically contain
vertically integrated utilities that own and operate everything from the generation of
power to its retail distribution. Deregulated markets commonly split generation from
distribution to encourage wholesale power generation competition. Overall, the complex
task of providing reliable, accessible, low-cost power while balancing the protection of
human life and the environment remains a challenge.
Note: The Electric Utilities & Power Generators industry covers activities related only to
electricity provision, not to natural gas provision. Some utilities may operate in both
electricity and natural gas markets. Utilities undertaking activities related to natural gas
sourcing and distribution also should consider the topics and metrics in the Gas Utilities
& Distributors (IF-GU) industry.
Sustainability Disclosure Topics & Metrics
Table 1. Sustainability Disclosure Topics & Metrics
TOPIC
METRIC
CATEGORY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
CODE
Greenhouse
Gas
Emissions &
Energy
Resource
Planning
(1) Gross global Scope 1 emissions,
percentage covered under
(2) emissions-limiting regulations and
(3) emissions-reporting regulations
Quantitative
Metric tons (t)
CO₂-e,
Percentage
(%)
IF-EU-110a.1
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
associated with power deliveries
Quantitative
Metric tons (t)
CO₂-e
IF-EU-110a.2
Discussion of long- and short-term
strategy or plan to manage Scope 1
emissions, emissions reduction targets,
and an analysis of performance against
those targets
Discussion
and Analysis
n/a
IF-EU-110a.3
continued...
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
3
...continued
TOPIC
METRIC
CATEGORY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
CODE
Water
Management
(1) Total water withdrawn, (2) total water
consumed; percentage of each in
regions with High or Extremely High
Baseline Water Stress
Quantitative
Thousand
cubic metres
(m³),
Percentage
(%)
IF-EU-140a.1
Number of incidents of non-compliance
associated with water quality permits,
standards and regulations
Quantitative
Number
IF-EU-140a.2
Description of water management risks
and discussion of strategies and
practices to mitigate those risks
Discussion
and Analysis
n/a
IF-EU-140a.3
End-Use
Efficiency &
Demand
Percentage of electric load served by
smart grid technology 29
Quantitative
Percentage
(%) by
megawatt
hours (MWh)
IF-EU-420a.2
Customer electricity savings from
efficiency measures, by market 30
Quantitative
Megawatt
hours (MWh)
IF-EU-420a.3
Nuclear
Safety &
Emergency
Management
Total number of nuclear power units,
broken down by results of most recent
independent safety review
Quantitative
Number
IF-EU-540a.1
Description of efforts to manage nuclear
safety and emergency preparedness
Discussion
and Analysis
n/a
IF-EU-540a.2
Grid
Resiliency
Number of incidents of non-compliance
with physical or cybersecurity standards
or regulations
Quantitative
Number
IF-EU-550a.1
(1) System Average Interruption
Duration Index (SAIDI), (2) System
Average Interruption Frequency Index
(SAIFI), and (3) Customer Average
Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI),
inclusive of major event days 31
Quantitative
Minutes,
Number
IF-EU-550a.2
Table 2. Activity Metrics
ACTIVITY METRIC
CATEGORY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
CODE
Number of: (1) residential, (2) commercial, and
(3) industrial customers served 32
Quantitative
Number
IF-EU-000.A
continued...
29
Note to IF-EU-420a.2 – The entity shall discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with
the development and operations of a smart grid.
30
Note to IF-EU-420a.3 – The entity shall discuss customer efficiency regulations relevant to each
market in which it operates.
31
Note to IF-EU-550a.2 – The entity shall discuss notable service disruptions such as those that
affected a significant number of customers or disruptions of extended duration.
32
Note to IF-EU-000.A – The number of customers served for each category shall be considered as
the number of meters billed for residential, commercial, and industrial customers.
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
4
© IFRS Foundation
...continued
ACTIVITY METRIC
CATEGORY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
CODE
Total electricity delivered to: (1) residential,
(2) commercial, (3) industrial, (4) all other retail
customers, and (5) wholesale customers
Quantitative
Megawatt
hours (MWh)
IF-EU-000.B
Length of transmission and distribution lines 33
Quantitative
Kilometres
(km)
IF-EU-000.C
Total electricity generated, percentage by major energy
source, percentage in regulated markets 34
Quantitative
Megawatt
hours (MWh),
Percentage
(%)
IF-EU-000.D
Total wholesale electricity purchased 35
Quantitative
Megawatt
hours (MWh)
IF-EU-000.E
Greenhouse Gas Emissions & Energy Resource Planning
Topic Summary
Electricity generation represents the largest source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in
the world. Mainly carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide, these emissions are mostly
by-products of fossil fuel combustion. The transmission or distribution (T&D) segments of
the industry produce negligible emissions. Electric utility entities could face significant
operating costs and capital expenditures for mitigating GHG emissions as environmental
regulations become increasingly stringent. Although many of these costs may be passed
to a utility’s customers, some power generators, especially in deregulated markets, may
be unable to recoup these costs. Entities may reduce GHG emissions from electricity
generation through careful infrastructure investment planning by ensuring the delivery
of an energy mix capable of meeting the emissions requirements set forth by regulations,
and by implementing industry-leading technologies and processes. Being proactive in
cost-effectively reducing GHG emissions may create a competitive advantage for entities
and mitigate unanticipated regulatory compliance costs. Failure to properly estimate
capital-expenditure needs and permitting costs, or other difficulties in reducing GHG
emissions, may result in significant negative effects on returns in the form of asset write-
downs, the costs to obtain carbon credits, or unexpected increases in operating and
capital expenditures. Regulatory emphasis on this issue may increase in the coming
decades, as exemplified by the international emissions-reduction agreement made at the
21st session of the United Nations Conference of the Parties in 2015.
33
Note to IF-EU-000.C – The length of transmission and distribution lines shall be calculated on a
circuit kilometre basis, where a circuit-kilometre is defined as the total length of circuits,
regardless of conductors used per circuit.
34
Note to IF-EU-000.D – Generation shall be disclosed by each of the following major energy
sources: coal, natural gas, nuclear, petroleum, hydropower, solar, wind, other renewables, and
other gases. The scope includes owned and/or operated assets. The scope excludes electricity
consumed at the generating facilities.
35
Note to IF-EU-000.E – The scope excludes electricity consumed at the generating facilities.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
5
Metrics
IF-EU-110a.1. (1) Gross global Scope 1 emissions, percentage covered under
(2) emissions-limiting regulations and (3) emissions-reporting regulations
1
The entity shall disclose its (1) gross global Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions to the atmosphere of the seven GHGs covered under the Kyoto Protocol
—carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen
trifluoride (NF3).
1.1
Emissions of all GHGs shall be consolidated and disclosed in metric tons of
carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2-e) and calculated in accordance with
published 100-year time horizon global warming potential (GWP) values.
To date, the preferred source for GWP values is the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fifth Assessment Report (2014).
1.2
Gross emissions are GHGs emitted into the atmosphere before accounting
for offsets, credits or other similar mechanisms that have reduced or
compensated for emissions.
2
Scope 1 emissions are defined and shall be calculated according to the
methodology contained in The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting and
Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol), Revised Edition, March 2004, published by the
World Resources Institute and the World Business Council on Sustainable
Development (WRI/WBCSD).
2.1
These emissions include direct emissions of GHGs from stationary or
mobile sources that include production facilities, office buildings and
product transportation (marine, road and rail).
2.2
Acceptable calculation methodologies include those that conform to the
GHG Protocol as the base reference, but provide additional guidance, such
as industry- or region-specific guidance. Examples include:
2.2.1
GHG Reporting Guidance for the Aerospace Industry published by the
International Aerospace Environmental Group (IAEG)
2.2.2
Greenhouse Gas Inventory Guidance: Direct Emissions from Stationary
Combustion Sources published by the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA)
2.2.3
India GHG Inventory Program
2.2.4
ISO 14064-1
2.2.5
Petroleum Industry Guidelines for reporting GHG emissions, 2nd edition,
2011, published by IPIECA
2.2.6
Protocol for the quantification of greenhouse gas emissions from waste
management
activities
published
by
Entreprises
pour
l’Environnement (EpE)
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
6
© IFRS Foundation
2.3
GHG emissions data shall be consolidated and disclosed according to the
approach with which the entity consolidates its financial reporting data,
which generally is aligned with the ‘financial control’ approach defined by
the GHG Protocol, and the approach published by the Climate Disclosure
Standards Board (CDSB) that is described in REQ-07, ‘Organisational
boundary’, of the CDSB Framework for reporting environmental and social
information.
3
The entity shall disclose (2) the percentage of its gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions covered under an emissions-limiting regulation or programme intended
to limit or reduce emissions directly, such as cap-and-trade schemes, carbon
tax/fee systems, and other emissions control (for example, command-and-control
approach) and permit-based mechanisms.
3.1
Examples of emissions-limiting regulations include:
3.1.1
California Cap-and-Trade (California Global Warming Solutions Act)
3.1.2
European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (EU ETS)
3.1.3
Quebec Cap-and-Trade (Quebec Environment Quality Act)
3.2
The percentage shall be calculated as the total amount of gross global
Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO2-e) covered under emissions-limiting
regulations divided by the total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions (CO2-e).
3.2.1
For emissions subject to more than one emissions-limiting
regulation, the entity shall not account for those emissions more
than once.
3.3
The scope of emissions-limiting regulations excludes emissions covered
under voluntary emissions-limiting regulations (for example, voluntary
trading systems), as well as reporting-based regulations.
4
The entity shall disclose (3) the percentage of its gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions that are covered under emissions reporting-based regulations.
4.1
Emissions reporting-based regulations are defined as regulations that
demand the disclosure of GHG emissions data to regulators and/or the
public, but for which there is no limit, cost, target, or controls on the
amount of emissions generated.
4.2
The percentage shall be calculated as the total amount of gross global
Scope 1 GHG emissions (CO2-e) that are covered under emissions reporting-
based regulations divided by the total amount of gross global Scope 1 GHG
emissions (CO2-e).
4.2.1
For emissions that are subject to more than one emissions
reporting-based regulation, the entity shall not account for those
emissions more than once.
4.3
The scope of emissions reporting-based regulations does not exclude
emissions covered under emissions-limiting regulations.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
7
5
The entity may discuss any change in its emissions from the previous reporting
period, including whether the change was because of emissions reductions,
divestment, acquisition, mergers, changes in output or changes in calculation
methodology.
6
In the case that current reporting of GHG emissions to the CDP or other entity
(for example, a national regulatory disclosure programme) differs in terms of the
scope and consolidation approach used, the entity may disclose those emissions.
However, primary disclosure shall be according to the guidelines described above.
7
The entity may discuss the calculation methodology for its emissions disclosure,
such as if data are from continuous emissions monitoring systems (CEMS),
engineering calculations or mass balance calculations.
IF-EU-110a.2. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with power
deliveries
1
The entity shall disclose gross global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated
with electric power delivered to retail customers, resulting from owned power
generation and purchased power.
1.1
GHG emissions are defined as emissions to the atmosphere of the seven
GHGs covered under the Kyoto Protocol—carbon dioxide (CO2), methane
(CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons
(PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride (SF6), and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).
1.1.1
Emissions of all GHGs shall be consolidated and disclosed in metric
tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-e), calculated in accordance
with published 100-year time horizon global warming potential
(GWP) values. To date, the preferred source for GWP factors is the
Intergovernmental
Panel
on
Climate
Change
(IPCC)
Fifth
Assessment Report (2014).
1.1.2
Gross emissions are GHGs emitted into the atmosphere before
accounting for offsets or credits.
2
GHG emissions associated with electric power delivered to retail customers are
defined by, and shall be calculated according to, the methodology established by
the numerator in ‘EPS Metric D-3: Retail Electric Deliveries’, contained in the
Electric Power Sector Protocol for the Voluntary Reporting Program, June 2009,
Version 1.0, provided by The Climate Registry, including 2010 Updates and
Clarifications (which clarified that ‘EPS Metric D-3: Retail Electric Deliveries’ was
mislabelled as ‘EPS Metric D-1’ in Version 1.0).
2.1
These emissions generally are calculated as the sum of emissions from
power generation facilities owned by the entity, and those from power
purchased from a third-party, subtracted by the emissions from power
that was resold at the wholesale level.
2.2
The scope of GHG emissions shall include all emissions associated with
power delivered to retail customers, including emissions associated with
power lost in transmission and distribution.
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
8
© IFRS Foundation
2.3
Emissions factors for power purchased from third-parties are based on the
most relevant and accurate method, which will depend on the type of
power purchased. The Electric Power Sector Protocol for the Voluntary
Reporting Program establishes potential methods.
3
Disclosure corresponds to the numerator in the metric contained in the Electric
Power Research Institute’s 2018 Metrics to Benchmark Electric Power Company
Sustainability Performance, ‘Total CO2 emissions rate for power deliveries’, except for
the scope of emissions including all seven GHGs covered under the Kyoto Protocol.
IF-EU-110a.3. Discussion of long- and short-term strategy or plan to manage
Scope 1 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance
against those targets
1
The entity shall discuss its long- and short-term strategy or plan to manage its
Scope 1 greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
1.1
Scope 1 emissions are defined and shall be calculated according to the
methodology contained in The Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Corporate Accounting
and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol), Revised Edition, March 2004,
published by the World Resources Institute and the World Business
Council on Sustainable Development (WRI/WBCSD).
1.2
The scope of GHG emissions includes the seven GHGs covered under the
Kyoto Protocol—carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O),
hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), sulphur hexafluoride
(SF6) and nitrogen trifluoride (NF3).
2
The entity shall discuss its emission reduction target(s) and analyse its
performance against the target(s), including, if relevant:
2.1
The scope of the emission reduction target (for example, the percentage of
total emissions to which the target is applicable);
2.2
Whether the target is absolute or intensity-based, and the metric
denominator if it is an intensity-based target;
2.3
The percentage reduction against the base year, with the base year
representing the first year against which emissions are evaluated towards
the achievement of the target;
2.4
The time lines for the reduction activity, including the start year, the
target year and the base year;
2.5
The mechanism(s) for achieving the target; and
2.6
Any circumstances in which the target or base year emissions have been,
or may be, recalculated retrospectively or the target or base year has been
reset.
3
The entity shall discuss its strategy to manage risks and opportunities associated
with the GHG emissions regulatory environment, which may include:
3.1
Any changes it has made or plans to make to its business structure or
model
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
9
3.2
The development of new technologies or services
3.3
Any changes it has made or plans to make to its operational process,
control or organisational structures
3.4
Influencing the regulatory or legislative process and outcomes, which may
include
interactions
with
regulators,
regulatory
agencies,
utility
commissions, legislators and policymakers
4
The entity may discuss its involvement in green power markets, including the
number of customers served (by customer category) and the corresponding
electricity generated.
4.1
Green power markets are defined as an optional utility service that allows
customers the opportunity to support a greater level of utility entity
investment in renewable energy technologies.
4.2
The entity may disclose instances in which the provision of green power
markets is required by state renewable portfolio standards.
5
The entity shall discuss the activities and investments required to achieve the
plans or targets, and any risks or limiting factors that might affect achievement of
the plans or targets.
6
The entity shall discuss the scope of its strategies, plans or reduction targets, such
as whether they pertain differently to different business units, geographies or
emissions sources.
7
The entity shall discuss whether its strategies, plans, or reduction targets are
related to, or associated with, emissions limiting or emissions reporting-based
programmes or regulations (for example, the EU Emissions Trading Scheme,
Quebec Cap-and-Trade System, California Cap-and-Trade Program), including
regional, national, international or sectoral programmes.
8
Disclosure of strategies, plans or reduction targets shall be limited to activities
that were ongoing (active) or reached completion during the reporting period.
Water Management
Topic Summary
Electricity generation is one of the most water-intensive industries in the world in terms
of water withdrawals. Thermoelectric power plants—typically coal, nuclear and natural
gas—use large quantities of water for cooling purposes. The industry is facing increasing
water-related supply and regulatory risks, potentially requiring capital investment in
technology or even creating stranded assets. As water supplies tighten in many regions—
and electricity generation, agriculture and community use compete for water supplies—
power plants increasingly may be unable to operate at full capacity, or at all, because of
region-specific water constraints. The availability of water is an important factor to
consider when calculating the future value of many electricity-generating assets and for
evaluating proposals for new generation sources. Increased water scarcity—because of
factors such as increasing consumption and reduced supplies resulting from climate
change, which could result in more frequent or intense droughts—could prompt
regulatory authorities to limit entities’ ability to withdraw necessary amounts of water,
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
10
© IFRS Foundation
especially in regions with high baseline water stress. Furthermore, entities must manage
the growing number of regulations related to the significant biodiversity impacts that
such large withdrawals may cause. To mitigate these risks, entities can invest both in
more efficient water-usage systems for plants, and place strategic priority on assessing
long-term water availability, as well as water-related biodiversity risks, when siting new
power plants.
Metrics
IF-EU-140a.1. (1) Total water withdrawn, (2) total water consumed; percentage of
each in regions with High or Extremely High Baseline Water Stress
1
The entity shall disclose the amount of water, in thousands of cubic metres,
withdrawn from all sources.
1.1
Water sources include surface water (including water from wetlands,
rivers, lakes and oceans), groundwater, rainwater collected directly and
stored by the entity, and water and wastewater obtained from municipal
water supplies, water utilities or other entities.
2
The entity may disclose portions of its supply by source if, for example, significant
portions of withdrawals are from non-freshwater sources.
2.1
Fresh water may be defined according to the local laws and regulations
where the entity operates. If no legal definition exists, fresh water shall be
considered to be water that has less than 1,000 parts per million of
dissolved solids.
2.2
Water obtained from a water utility in compliance with jurisdictional
drinking water regulations can be assumed to meet the definition of fresh
water.
3
The entity shall disclose the amount of water, in thousands of cubic metres,
consumed in its operations.
3.1
Water consumption is defined as:
3.1.1
Water that evaporates during withdrawal, use and discharge
3.1.2
Water that is directly or indirectly incorporated into the entity’s
product or service
3.1.3
Water that does not otherwise return to the same catchment area
from which it was withdrawn, such as water returned to another
catchment area or the sea
4
The entity shall analyse all its operations for water risks and identify activities
that withdraw and consume water in locations with High (40–80%) or Extremely
High (>80%) Baseline Water Stress as classified by the World Resources Institute’s
(WRI) Water Risk Atlas tool, Aqueduct.
5
The entity shall disclose water withdrawn in locations with High or Extremely
High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water withdrawn.
6
The entity shall disclose water consumed in locations with High or Extremely
High Baseline Water Stress as a percentage of the total water consumed.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
11
IF-EU-140a.2. Number of incidents of non-compliance associated with water
quality permits, standards and regulations
1
The entity shall disclose the total number of incidents of non-compliance,
including violations of a technology-based standard and exceedances of quantity
or quality-based standards.
2
The scope of disclosure includes incidents governed by applicable jurisdictional
statutory permits and regulations, which include the discharge of a hazardous
substance, violation of pre-treatment requirements or total maximum daily load
(TMDL) exceedances.
3
The scope of disclosure shall only include incidents of non-compliance that
resulted in a formal enforcement action(s).
3.1
Formal enforcement actions are defined as governmental recognised
actions that address a violation or threatened violation of water quantity
or quality laws, regulations, policies or orders, and can result in
administrative penalty orders, administrative orders and judicial actions,
among others.
4
Violations shall be disclosed, regardless of their measurement methodology or
frequency. These include violations for:
4.1
Continuous discharges, limitations, standards and prohibitions that are
generally expressed as maximum daily, weekly and monthly averages; and
4.2
Non-continuous discharges, limitations that are generally expressed in
terms of frequency, total mass, maximum rate of discharge and mass or
concentration of specified pollutants.
IF-EU-140a.3. Description of water management risks and discussion of
strategies and practices to mitigate those risks
1
The entity shall describe its water management risks associated with water
withdrawals, water consumption and discharge of water or wastewater.
1.1
Risks associated with water withdrawals and water consumption include
risks to the availability of adequate, clean water resources, which include:
1.1.1
Environmental constraints—such as operating in water-stressed
regions,
drought,
concerns
of
aquatic
impingement
or
entrainment, interannual or seasonal variability, and risks from
the impact of climate change
1.1.2
Regulatory and financial constraints—such as volatility in water
costs, stakeholder perceptions and concerns related to water
withdrawals (for example, those from local communities, non-
governmental organisations and regulatory agencies), direct
competition with and impact from the actions of other users (for
example, commercial and municipal users), restrictions to
withdrawals because of regulations, and constraints on the entity’s
ability to obtain and retain water rights or permits
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
12
© IFRS Foundation
1.2
Risks associated with the discharge of water or wastewater include the
ability to obtain rights or permits related to discharges, regulatory
compliance related to discharges, restrictions to discharges, the ability to
maintain control over the temperature of water discharges, liabilities,
reputational risks and increased operating costs because of regulation,
stakeholder perceptions and concerns related to water discharges (for
example, those from local communities, non-governmental organisations
and regulatory agencies).
2
The entity may describe water management risks in the context of:
2.1
How risks may vary by withdrawal source, including surface water
(including water from wetlands, rivers, lakes and oceans), groundwater,
rainwater collected directly and stored by the entity, and water and
wastewater obtained from municipal water supplies, water utilities or
other entities; and
2.2
How risks may vary by discharge destinations, including surface water,
groundwater or wastewater utilities.
3
The entity may discuss the potential effects that water management risks may
have on its operations and the time line over which such risks are expected to
manifest.
3.1
Effects include those associated with costs, revenue, liabilities, continuity
of operations and reputation.
4
The entity shall discuss its short- and long-term strategies or plans to mitigate
water management risks, which include:
4.1
The scope of its strategy, plans, goals or targets, such as how they relate to
various business units, geographies or water-consuming operational
processes.
4.2
Any water management goals or targets it has prioritised, and an analysis
of performance against those goals or targets.
4.2.1
Goals and targets include those associated with reducing water
withdrawals,
reducing
water
consumption,
reducing
water
discharges, reducing aquatic impingements, improving the quality
of water discharges and regulatory compliance.
4.3
The activities and investments required to achieve the plans, goals or
targets, and any risks or limiting factors that might affect achievement of
the plans or targets.
4.4
Disclosure of strategies, plans, goals or targets shall be limited to activities
that were ongoing (active) or reached completion during the reporting
period.
5
For water management targets, the entity shall additionally disclose:
5.1
Whether the target is absolute or intensity-based, and the metric
denominator if it is an intensity-based target.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
13
5.2
The time lines for the water management activities, including the start
year, the target year and the base year.
5.3
The mechanism(s) for achieving the target, including:
5.3.1
Efficiency efforts, such as the use of water recycling or closed-loop
systems;
5.3.2
Product innovations, such as redesigning products or services to
require less water;
5.3.3
Process and equipment innovations, such as those that enable the
reduction of aquatic impingements or entrainments;
5.3.4
Use of tools and technologies (for example, the World Wildlife
Fund Water Risk Filter, the Global Water Tool and Water Footprint
Network Footprint Assessment Tool) to analyse water use, risks and
opportunities; and
5.3.5
Collaborations or programmes in place with the community or
other organisations.
5.4
The percentage reduction or improvement from the base year, in which
the base year is the first year against which water management targets are
evaluated towards the achievement of the target.
6
The entity shall discuss whether its water management practices result in any
additional lifecycle impacts or trade-offs in its organisation, including trade-offs
in land use, energy production and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and why the
entity chose these practices despite lifecycle trade-offs.
End-Use Efficiency & Demand
Topic Summary
Energy efficiency is a low-lifecycle-cost method to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG)
emissions, because less electricity needs to be generated to provide the same end-use
energy services. Utilities can promote energy efficiency and conservation among their
customers. Such strategies may include offering rebates for energy-efficient appliances,
weatherising customers’ homes, educating customers on energy-saving methods, offering
incentives to customers to curb electricity use during times of peak demand (‘demand
response’), or investing in technology such as smart meters, which allow customers to
track their energy use. While saving consumers money, these efforts also may reduce
operating costs for electric utilities by decreasing peak demand. Furthermore, depending
on the utility regulatory framework, local jurisdictions may mandate that entities
develop energy efficiency plans before permitting new builds. Companies with effective
strategies to reduce the downside risks from demand fluctuations, may gain adequate
and timely returns on needed investments. Furthermore, reducing costs through
efficiency initiatives may earn higher, long-term risk-adjusted returns.
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
14
© IFRS Foundation
Metrics
IF-EU-420a.2. Percentage of electric load served by smart grid technology
1
The entity shall disclose the percentage of its electric load, in megawatt hours,
served by smart grid technology.
1.1
The electric load served by smart grid technology is defined as the amount
of electricity delivered to the entity’s customers that incorporates the use
of smart grid technologies to meet the electricity demand of the
consumer.
1.2
A smart grid is defined, consistent with the International Energy Agency
(IEA), as an electricity network that uses digital and other advanced
technologies to monitor and manage the transport of electricity from all
generation sources to meet the varying electricity demands of end users.
Smart grids coordinate the needs and capabilities of all generators, grid
operators, end users and electricity market stakeholders to operate all
parts of the system as efficiently as possible, minimising costs and
environmental impacts while maximising system reliability, resilience and
stability.
1.3
An electric load is considered to be served by smart grid technology when
the technology enables one or more of the distinguishing characteristics
defined by the IEA:
1.3.1
Enables informed participation by customers
1.3.2
Accommodates all generation and storage options
1.3.3
Enables new products, services and markets
1.3.4
Provides the power quality for the range of needs
1.3.5
Optimises asset utilisation and operation efficiency
1.3.6
Provides resiliency to disturbances, attacks and natural disasters
1.4
Examples of smart grid technologies may include wide-area monitoring
and control, information and communication technology integration,
renewable
and
distributed
generation
integration,
transmission
enhancement,
distribution
grid
management,
advanced
metering
infrastructure, electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and customer-side
systems.
2
The percentage of load served by smart grid technology shall be calculated as the
total amount of energy load, in megawatt hours, served by smart grid technology
divided by the total amount of energy load, in megawatt hours.
3
The entity may discuss the type of smart grid technology through which its
electric load is served, the customer types using the technology (for example,
residential, commercial or industrial), whether technologies are owned by the
utility or the customer, and any plans for further integration of smart grid
capabilities.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
15
Note to IF-EU-420a.2
1
The entity shall discuss the opportunities and challenges associated with the
development and operation of a smart grid, including, if relevant:
1.1
Demand-response and end-user efficiency opportunities (for example,
smoothing of the demand curve, increased cost-effective electric
generation, improved incorporation of distributed generation, and
increased generation and transmission efficiency)
1.2
Political and deployment challenges (for example, opposition to smart grid
development, disparate degrees of technology deployment and economic
disincentives)
IF-EU-420a.3. Customer electricity savings from efficiency measures, by market
1
The entity shall disclose the total amount of electricity savings delivered to
customers, in megawatt hours, from energy efficiency measures during the
reporting period, for each of its markets.
1.1
Markets are defined as those operations subject to distinct public utility
regulatory oversight.
1.2
Electricity savings are defined according to the gross savings approach as
the changes in energy consumption or demand that result from
programme-related actions taken by participants in an efficiency
programme, regardless of why they participated.
1.2.1
The entity may list those markets where it reports electricity
savings on a net electricity savings basis, and thus, may be different
from the figures disclosed here. Net electricity savings are defined
as changes in consumption specifically attributable to an energy
efficiency programme, and that would not have occurred in the
absence of the programme.
2
Electricity savings shall be calculated on a gross basis but consistent with the
methodology set forth in applicable jurisdictional evaluation, measurement and
verification (EM&V) regulations where such savings occur.
3
The scope of electricity savings from efficiency measures includes savings
delivered directly by the entity and, where regulations provide, savings
substantiated through purchases of efficiency savings credits.
3.1
For any savings from efficiency measures delivered directly by the entity,
any efficiency savings credits shall be retained (not sold) and retired or
cancelled on behalf of the entity for the entity to claim them as delivered
electricity savings.
3.2
For efficiency savings credits purchased, the agreement shall explicitly
include and convey that credits be retained and retired on behalf of the
entity for the entity to claim them.
Note to IF-EU-420a.3
1
The entity shall discuss regulations related to customer efficiency measures for
each of its relevant markets, including:
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
16
© IFRS Foundation
1.1
The amount or percentage of electricity savings from efficiency measures
required by regulations for each market.
1.2
Instances of non-compliance with electricity savings obligations.
1.3
In such instances, the entity shall disclose the difference between the
energy savings delivered and the amount required by the regulation.
1.4
Electricity savings delivered that exceed those required by regulations and
that resulted in the entity receiving energy efficiency performance
incentives, including the value of any such incentives.
2
The entity shall discuss the forms of policy, by each market, that allow for, or
incentivise, energy efficiency, including a discussion of the benefits, challenges
and financial effects associated with such regulations.
3
Relevant policy mechanisms to discuss may include:
3.1
Deferral decoupling
3.2
Current period decoupling
3.3
Single fixed variable rates
3.4
Lost revenue adjustments
3.5
Energy efficiency feebates
4
For markets lacking regulations that allow for, or incentivise, energy efficiency,
the entity shall discuss its stance on and efforts to manage risks and opportunities
relating to such regulation.
5
The entity may discuss any efforts to meet regulations through incentives it has
developed for its customers that promote end-use efficiency, including dynamic
pricing, energy efficiency rebates and other measures to subsidise customer
energy efficiency.
Nuclear Safety & Emergency Management
Topic Summary
Although rare, nuclear accidents can have significant human health and environmental
consequences because of their severity. Owners of nuclear power plants in many regions
have operated for decades without any major public safety incidents, but the occurrence
of infrequent but large-magnitude incidents anywhere in the world can have major
effects on the entire nuclear power industry. Entities that own and operate nuclear
plants may lose their licence to operate, as well as face many other financial
consequences in the event of an accident—though entities carry insurance and may have
legal protections from some liabilities. Failure to comply with the safety regulations can
be expensive to nuclear power operators; in extreme circumstances it may make the
continued operation of the plant uneconomical. Facing potentially significant financial
repercussions, both from ongoing safety compliance as well as tail risk incidents, entities
that own or operate nuclear plants must be vigilant in the safety compliance, best
practices and upgrades of their facilities. They also must maintain robust emergency
preparedness training for their staff and a strong safety culture. These measures can
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
17
reduce the probability that accidents will occur and enable an entity to effectively detect
and respond to such incidents.
Metrics
IF-EU-540a.1. Total number of nuclear power units, broken down by results of
most recent independent safety review
1
The entity shall disclose the total number of nuclear power units that it owns or
operates, where:
1.1
A nuclear power unit is defined as a nuclear reactor and associated
equipment necessary for electric power generation, including those
structures, systems and components required to provide reasonable
assurance that the facility can be operated without undue risk to the
health and safety of the public.
2
The entity shall provide a breakdown of nuclear power units that it owns or
operates by results of the most recent independent safety review.
2.1
A review is considered independent when conducted by third parties who
are not and have not been directly involved with the design or operation of
the nuclear power unit.
2.2
For applicable jurisdictions, the entity shall disclose the results of the most
recent independent safety review for both regulatory and peer reviews.
2.3
The entity shall disclose the applicable jurisdictional regulation, guideline
or standard under which the safety review was conducted.
IF-EU-540a.2. Description of efforts to manage nuclear safety and emergency
preparedness
1
The entity shall describe its efforts to manage nuclear safety and emergency
preparedness, including its efforts to identify, report and assess initiating events
and event sequences relating to nuclear safety and emergency preparedness.
1.1
Initiating events are defined as natural or human-induced events that
cause an event sequence.
1.2
An event sequence is defined as a series of actions or occurrences within
the natural and engineered components of a geologic repository operations
area that potentially could lead to exposure of individuals to radiation. An
event sequence includes one or more initiating events and associated
combinations of repository system component failures, including those
produced by the action or inaction of operating staff.
1.3
Disclosure may focus broadly on nuclear safety and emergency
management systems, but it specifically shall address the systems in place
to avoid and manage initiating events, accidents, emergencies and
incidents that could have catastrophic impacts on human health, the local
community and the environment.
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
18
© IFRS Foundation
2
The entity shall discuss how it manages nuclear safety and emergency
preparedness, such as through training, rules and guidelines (and their
enforcement), implementation of emergency plans and use of technology.
3
The entity shall discuss its efforts to create and maintain a culture of nuclear
safety and emergency preparedness, including efforts to institute the traits of a
positive safety culture, where the traits of a positive safety culture include:
3.1
Leadership safety values and actions
3.2
Problem identification and resolution
3.3
Personal accountability
3.4
Work process
3.5
Continuous learning
3.6
Environment for raising concerns
3.7
Effective safety communications
3.8
Respectful work environment
3.9
Questioning attitude
4
The entity may discuss implementation of the Institute of Nuclear Power
Operations’ (INPO) Principles for a Strong Nuclear Safety Culture or the
International Atomic Energy Agency’s (IAEA) Best Practices in the Utilization and
Dissemination of Operating Experience at Nuclear Power Plants.
Grid Resiliency
Topic Summary
Electricity is critical for the continued function of most elements of modern life, from
medicine to finance, creating a societal reliance on continuous service. Major disruptions
to electricity infrastructure may result in potentially high societal costs. Disruptions can
be caused by extreme weather events, natural disasters and cyberattacks. As the
frequency and severity of extreme weather events associated with climate change
continues to increase, all segments of electric utilities entities—and especially major
transmission and distribution (T&D) operations—will face increasing physical threats to
their infrastructure. Extreme weather events could result in frequent or significant
service disruptions, outages and require upgrade or repair of damaged or compromised
equipment, all of which may add substantial costs and damage brand reputation among
regulators and customers. The increased use of smart grid technology has several
benefits, including strengthening the resiliency of the grid to extreme weather events.
However, this technology may make the grid more vulnerable to cyberattacks, because it
provides hackers more entryways into infrastructure systems. Entities must implement
strategies that minimise the probability and magnitude of impacts from extreme weather
events and cyberattacks. To remain competitive in the face of increasing external
competition, entities must improve the reliability, resilience and quality of their
infrastructure.
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
19
Metrics
IF-EU-550a.1. Number of incidents of non-compliance with physical or
cybersecurity standards or regulations
1
The entity shall disclose the total number of instances of non-compliance with
physical or cybersecurity standards or regulations applicable to electricity
infrastructure owned or operated by the entity.
1.1
The scope of physical or cybersecurity standards or regulations includes
mandatory, enforceable standards and regulations intended to mitigate
physical or cybersecurity risks related to the reliability or resiliency of
electricity infrastructure, including the electricity grid.
1.1.1
The entity may disclose instances of non-compliance with
voluntary physical or cybersecurity standards or regulations.
IF-EU-550a.2. (1) System Average Interruption Duration Index (SAIDI), (2) System
Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI), and (3) Customer Average
Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI), inclusive of major event days
1
The entity shall disclose its (1) System Average Interruption Duration Index
(SAIDI), in minutes.
1.1
The SAIDI is defined as the total duration of an interruption for the
average customer during the period under reporting.
1.2
The entity shall calculate its SAIDI as the total number of customers
interrupted multiplied by the duration of interruptions (restoration time)
divided by the total number of customers served, written as ∑(ri × Ni) / NT
1.2.1
∑ = Summation function
1.2.2
ri = Restoration time, in minutes
1.2.3
Ni = Total number of customers interrupted
1.2.4
NT = Total number of customers served
2
The entity shall disclose its (2) System Average Interruption Frequency Index
(SAIFI).
2.1
SAIFI is defined as the average number of times that a system customer
experiences an outage during the period under reporting.
2.2
The entity shall calculate its SAIFI as the total number of customers
interrupted divided by the total number of customers served, written as ∑
(Ni ) / NT
2.2.1
∑ = Summation function
2.2.2
Ni= Total number of customers interrupted
2.2.3
NT = Total number of customers served
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
20
© IFRS Foundation
3
The entity shall disclose its (3) Customer Average Interruption Duration Index
(CAIDI).
3.1
The CAIDI is defined as the average amount of time required to restore
service once an outage has occurred.
3.2
The entity shall calculate its CAIDI as the total number of customers
interrupted multiplied by the duration of interruptions (restoration time
in minutes) divided by the sum of the number of customers interrupted,
written as ∑(Ni × ri) / ∑(Ni)
3.2.1
∑ = Summation function
3.2.2
ri = Restoration time, in minutes
3.2.3
Ni = Total number of customers interrupted
4
The entity shall disclose its SAIDI, SAIFI and CAIDI inclusive of major event days,
where:
4.1
Major event days are defined, according to IEEE Std 1366, as days in which
the daily SAIDI exceeds a threshold value, TMED, where TMED is calculated
as follows:
4.1.1
The entity should collect values of daily SAIDI for five sequential
years, ending on the last day of the last complete reporting period.
If fewer than five years of historical data are available, use all the
available historical data.
4.1.2
If any day in the data set has a value of zero for SAIDI, replace it
with the lowest non-zero SAIDI value in the data set—this permits
taking the logarithm of every day.
4.1.3
Take the natural logarithm (ln) of each daily SAIDI value in the
data set.
4.1.4
Find α (Alpha), the average of the logarithms (also known as the
logaverage) of the data set.
4.1.5
Find β (Beta), the standard deviation of the logarithms (also known
as the log-average) of the data set.
4.1.6
Compute the major event day threshold, TMED, using the equation:
TMED = e(α+β) .
4.1.7
Any day with daily SAIDI greater than the threshold value TMED
that occurs during the subsequent reporting period is a major
event day.
Note to IF-EU-550a.2
1
The entity shall discuss notable service disruptions such as those that affected a
significant number of customers, or disruptions of extended duration.
2
For such disruptions, the entity should provide:
IFRS S2 CLIMATE-RELATED DISCLOSURES–JUNE 2023
© IFRS Foundation
21
2.1
Description and cause of the service disruption
2.2
The total generation or transmission capacity, in megawatts, and
population affected by the disruption
2.3
The costs associated with the service disruption
2.4
Actions taken to mitigate the potential for future service interruptions
2.5
Any other significant outcomes (for example, legal proceedings or related
fatalities).
IFRS S2 INDUSTRY-BASED GUIDANCE
22
© IFRS Foundation
© IFRS Foundation
23
Columbus Building
7 Westferry Circus
Canary Wharf
London E14 4HD, UK
Tel
+44 (0) 20 7246 6410
Email sustainability_licensing@ifrs.org
ifrs.org
International Financial Reporting Standards®, IFRS Foundation®,
IFRS®, IAS®, IFRIC®, SIC®, IASB®, ISSBTM, IFRS for SMEs®
版本与出处
- ifrs-s2-ibg-volume-32-electric-utilities-and-power-generators-part-b